How Contragenix LLC Achieved Seven OASIS+ (Phase I) Awards Without a Single Rejection
Executive Summary
A group of small and mid-sized federal contractors faced a high-risk, points-based qualification environment under OASIS+ Phase I, where even minor documentation gaps could result in disqualification. Contragenix LLC applied an evidence-driven, audit-ready qualification framework to restructure their self-scoring, documentation, and domain positioning. The result: seven out of seven contractors successfully secured OASIS+ Phase I awards, with no compliance rejections and significantly reduced qualification risk. The engagement delivered stronger scoring discipline, accelerated submission readiness, and long-term competitive positioning for future IDIQ opportunities.
Contragenix was engaged to help a consortium of leadership experts and organizational coaches respond to this opportunity. Our client deeply committed to equity, wellness, and leadership grounded in lived experience needed a strategy that honored both their depth and their humanity.
Client Background
The clients were small and mid-sized federal government contractors operating across professional services, engineering, logistics, intelligence support, and enterprise solutions. These firms were actively pursuing contract vehicle access to expand their federal footprint but lacked internal infrastructure to navigate a highly structured, self-scoring acquisition model.
Their goals included:
-
Securing placement on a Best-in-Class governmentwide contract vehicle
-
Reducing qualification and compliance risk
-
Building repeatable internal processes for future large-scale federal procurements
Challenge
OASIS+ Phase I introduced a self-scoring, evidence-driven qualification process where contractors were required to prove their eligibility through defensible documentation rather than traditional narrative proposals.
The clients faced critical risks including:
-
Inaccurate or inflated self-scoring
-
Fragmented documentation across systems
-
Misalignment between past performance and service domains
-
High probability of disqualification due to audit failures
Failure would not only mean losing the bid but also missing multi-year federal market access.
Problem Analysis
The complexity of the challenge included:
-
Rigid GSA scoring thresholds with no margin for interpretive flexibility
-
Significant documentation burdens for contracts, financials, and compliance evidence
-
Tight timelines for internal readiness and submission
-
Lack of standardized internal frameworks to support point-based federal acquisitions
The clients did not need stronger writing. They needed structural qualification engineering.
Solution
Contragenix LLC designed and deployed a repeatable, evidence-first qualification system specifically aligned to the OASIS+ evaluation model, including:
-
A custom Scoring Architecture Framework to align proof with point-bearing criteria
-
Centralized Evidence Engineering Repositories to organize contracts, compliance artifacts, and performance data
-
Defensibility Audits to validate each claimed point before submission
-
Strategic Domain and Track Optimization to maximize real scoring probability instead of aspirational targeting
-
Submission-ready Compliance Matrices to reduce audit and protest exposure
Each solution was tailored based on contractor size, target domains, and internal maturity.
Implementation
Contragenix executed the engagement through a structured, phased delivery model:
-
Rapid onboarding workshops to map capabilities and risk exposure
-
Parallel scoring and documentation workflows to compress timelines
-
Weekly internal defensibility reviews to eliminate weak claims early
-
Direct collaboration with executive leadership, capture, and compliance teams
This approach created clarity, speed, and internal alignment without disrupting client operations.
Results
-
7 of 7 contractors awarded OASIS+ Phase I contracts
-
0 compliance rejections across all supported submissions
-
Average self-score improvement of 25–40% after structured intervention
-
Submission preparation time reduced by 30–40%
Conclusion
This engagement demonstrated that success in OASIS+ is driven by engineering discipline, not persuasive writing. By treating self-scoring as an auditable technical system, Contragenix helped contractors eliminate qualification risk, strengthen internal infrastructure, and secure long-term federal market positioning.
The frameworks built during OASIS+ Phase I now enable these contractors to scale faster, compete confidently, and expand naturally into OASIS+ Phase II.
If your organization is preparing for OASIS+ Phase II or needs to improve its scoring defensibility for point-based federal vehicles, Contragenix LLC offers structured strategy sessions, compliance-first proposal reviews, and qualification engineering support.
Contact Contragenix LLC to schedule a private readiness assessment and reduce your qualification risk before submission.